When the Decisions Cannot Be Outsourced

At a certain level of leadership, decision-making changes its character.

The issues are no longer technical.

The data is no longer complete.

And the responsibility can no longer be delegated.

This is the point at which many senior leaders quietly struggle—not because they lack intelligence or experience, but because the nature of leadership itself has shifted.

In periods of strategic disruption—driven by AI, technological acceleration, market volatility, or systemic uncertainty—leaders are expected to move faster while carrying far greater consequence. Yet speed is not the same as clarity, and decisiveness is not the same as wisdom.

What is rarely acknowledged is that leadership failure at these moments is seldom the result of poor analysis. More often, it arises because decisions are made without a protected space to think—or without the personal support required to take consequential leaps in judgment and follow them through.

At this level, leadership is no longer about applying best practice. It is about integrating strategy, power, risk, ethics, and personal responsibility into decisions that cannot be outsourced, delegated, or reversed without cost.

Without such a space, it becomes easy for leaders to let urgency override judgment, confidence mask uncertainty, or ethical considerations be deferred rather than integrated. Fear can quietly narrow strategic imagination, while pressure encourages shortcuts that look like decisiveness but are, in fact, avoidance.

Problems arise when the world—and the organisation—changes faster than the internal operating system of the leader.

It is well documented that between 70 and 80 per cent of large-scale transformations fail to achieve their intended outcomes. Strategy collapses not because leaders lack intelligence, but because their internal capacity has not kept pace with the complexity they face.

The most effective leaders I work with understand something subtle but critical: the quality of a decision is inseparable from the quality of awareness from which it is made.

Under sustained pressure, unexamined assumptions can lead to denial or paralysis. Hidden fears can leak into strategy. Leaders can convince themselves that knee-jerk reactions are the price of speed—when they are often a sign that reflection has been squeezed out.

To make decisions that hold over time, leaders need the discipline to pause and deepen clarity before acting. This is difficult to achieve alone. It requires structured time out in a safe space—one that combines rigorous challenge with personal support.

Such a space allows leaders to integrate analysis with judgment, speed with ethics, authority with humility. It enables practical wisdom rather than reactive certainty.

In an era where certainty is increasingly unavailable, this kind of thinking is not a luxury. It is a leadership necessity.

As disruption accelerates, the leaders who thrive will not be those with the loudest answers, but those with the capacity to think clearly—when the decisions cannot be outsourced.

Written by Margot Cairnes.
Have you read?
Why Your Personal Brand Is a Promise, Not a Performance.
What São Paulo, Ho Chi Minh City, and Cairo Reveal About the Rise of Global Megacities.
The Succession Blind Spot: How Founder Dependence Hurts Valuation and M&A Deal Speed.
Strategy and Sports: Using Athletic Metaphors to Drive Strategic Business Growth.
Skip Resolutions and Audit Your Values: A Smarter Approach to Personal Growth.